RE: Krysalis.Version
"Adam Jack" <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:39:34 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.krysalis.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002b01c35d0a$de73e820$e61ce641@wdn086> |
François Mireaux wrote: > Yesterday, looking for information about Java versioning, I have found > Krysalis.Version project which seems to be very interesting but : > - there is no clear description of project & team > - no contacts > - no download > - many dead links All these (with the exception, perhaps, of road map) are resolved [I hope] on http://www.krysalis.org/version A short version of a Road Map (given current thinking) is: 1) Improve the tools via user feedback/comment/bug fixing. 2) Increase the environments it runs in (since it is runtime sensitive): Centipede AntLibs -- close, classpath issues Eclipse Plugins -- work-in-progress (see www site) ... and then perhaps webapps/etc. 3) Improve the applicability to new version forms/media. 4) Increase the "intelligence" of the tools & reduce the user effort: 4.1) Allow a build to write a build_environment.xml (capturing the environment version) and subsequence (perhaps user) builds to automatically compare their environment to it. 4.2) Automatically generate constraint files, for users to edit. Longer term, perhaps work with Ruper to "Update a complete environment" -- get a "good working set" of all the dependencies for X -- that are compatible (according to algorithm/constraints) -- as a working set. Comments? I'd love to hear them. regards Adam ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01