Re: adasockets / GNAT.Sockets

Thomas De Contes <[email protected]> Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:16:08 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.ada.sockets
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 4 nov. 07 =E0 21:15, Samuel Tardieu a =E9crit :

>>>>>> "Thomas" =3D=3D Thomas De Contes <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Thomas> Which is the advantage of adasockets compared to
> Thomas> GNAT.Sockets ?
>
> I prefer its interface, which is of a higher level than GNAT.Sockets
> one.

Could you give me some examples, please ?

Looking at PingPong example (in GNAT.Sockets), i don't see anything  =

else than Initialize and Finalize,
Is it enough to say that it is higher level ?


>
> Thomas> I thought that it was the streams, because GNAT.Sockets would
> Thomas> not allow to use streams as easily as adasockets, but it seems
> Thomas> that it's wrong (or is it an innovation of ada 2005 ?)
>
> I doubt Ada2005 has had any influence on a GNAT.* package :)

I don't remember if it was in the old versions of GNAT or not

But it may be a GNAT enhancement :-)


-- =

j'agis contre l'assistanat, je travaille dans une SCOP !


_______________________________________________
AdaSockets mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rfc1149.net/mailman/listinfo/adasockets