Re: C macros

Marc Hunter <marc-G5HfMHItY0AlJZD/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.as400.c
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Frank,

Here is a discussion on the topic:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14041453/why-are-preprocessor-macros-evil-and-what-are-the-alternatives

HTH,

Marc


On 4/4/2014 1:24 AM, Frank Kolmann wrote:
> Hi Barbara
>
>
>
> Thank you for your comments. I am happy to start a discussion on macros.
>
> Please understand I value and appreciate your comments.
>
> Couple of points.
>
>
>
> I found the 'forever' macro in this book. pp97
>
>
>
>                  The C programming Language
>
>                  By Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie.
>
>                  Published by Prentice-Hall in 1988
>
>                  ISBN 0-13-110362-8 (paperback)
>
>                  ISBN 0-13-110370-9
>
> --  exerpt --
>
>                  Any name may be defined with any replacement text. For
> example
>
>                  #define forever for (;;) /* infinite loop */
>
>                  defines a new word, forever, for an infinite loop.
>
>
>
> Do you mean to say that the C gods K&R themselves published weird code?
>
>
>
> Also if C programmers cannot cope with macros does not that imply they
>
> are not truly C programmers.
>
>
>
> Why does C have the ability to have such marco substitution if it is
>
> not to be used.
>
> Particularly if it helps avoid a potential bug that the compiler
>
> does not report and only manifests at execution time (= for ==).
>
>
>
> I believe I will have no problem interpreting the standard C
>
> code or other C code with macros.
>
>
>
> Frank
>
>
>
>
>
>> *Subject: Re: First C Program
>> *From: Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> *Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:42:13 -0400
>> Hi Frank, I have been thinking about the use of macros such as
>> EQ, forever, NE etc, and I think you are doing yourself a disservice
>> by using these macros as a beginner C programmer. Here are some of the
> reasons:
>
>> You will find it less easy to read "normal" C code if you don't get
>> used to seeing *and quickly interpreting* things like != == for(;;)
>> You will find it more difficult to incorporate code that you find on the
> web.
>
>> You will have to either change all the == and != to use your macros,
>> or perhaps even worse, you will have a mixture of EQ and ==.
>> You will not be able to post snippets of code to forums without
>> replacing your macros. I wouldn't post weird code like that to any forum
>> even with an explanation for what the macros mean.
>> The discussion would almost certainly be more about the use of the macros
>> than about whatever question you were trying to ask.

-- 
This is the Bare Metal Programming IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (C400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: C400-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/c400-l
or email: C400-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.