Re: JDBC performance issues after moving to Java 8

The utility Charles pointed me to is not showing a DNS issue. what we are
seeing is that the program sits in TIMA status most of the time, and
periodically shifts over to RUN just long enough so that if we sit
WRKACTJOB and repeatedly press F5 it will go to RUN and immediately back to
TIMA every once in a while. Another thing we are seeing is that there are
generally three Mutexes out there for the job, but once again if we
repeatedly refresh the screen, that periodically will drop down to 1, and
immediately back to three.

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 1:20 PM Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel-zbO79nAUJZvJTQUaaPvyeQC/[email protected]>
wrote:

> I can't answer the changes to Java question, Tim would have to respond to
> that.  My situation is experiential.  Assuming Networking (as Tim pointed
> out) is not the issue, we've found some applications do run better in the
> 64bit version.
>
> Paging is clearly not an issue on your system.
>
>
> --
> Jim Oberholtzer
> Agile Technology Architects
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JAVA400-L [mailto:java400-l-bounces-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark
> Murphy
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2018 11:47 AM
> To: Java Programming on and around the IBM i <java400-l-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: JDBC performance issues after moving to Java 8
>
> I'm not sure it's an issue with the pool it's in, we have 10Gb in *BASE,
> and
> 42Gb in *INTERACT, and very low paging and faulting (0 in *MACHINE pool, 10
> in *BASE, 6 in *INTERACT) those are total numbers between DB and Non-DB.
>
> I have thought about using 64bit. We aren't running out of memory though
> that I am aware of, and I was under the impression that using the 64bit JVM
> is less performant unless you need it. Have changes been made to Java to
> invalidate that?
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 11:25 AM Jim Oberholtzer
> <midrangel-zbO79nAUJZvJTQUaaPvyeQC/[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Consider moving to the 64bit version.  I've had some success with
> > improvements that way.  Depending on how memory intensive the
> > application is you might have to add memory to the shared memory pool
> > where it's running.
> >
> > Which brings up another point, you should be moving these processes
> > into a shared memory pool and getting them out if *BASE.
> >
> > --
> > Jim Oberholtzer
> > Agile Technology Architects
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: JAVA400-L [mailto:java400-l-bounces-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > Mark Murphy
> > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2018 7:58 AM
> > To: Java Programming on and around the IBM i <java400-l-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
> > Subject: JDBC performance issues after moving to Java 8
> >
> > We have a Java application running on IBM i v7.1. It was working fine
> > with Java 6, but when we moved to Java 8 in preparation for an upgrade
> > to v7.3, the program started taking over an hour to run. As far as I
> > know, the only change was to move to Java 8. We are using the 32 bit
> > JVM for both Java 6 and Java 8.
> >
> > Any ideas on where to look for issues? We are not getting any errors
> > that I know of, and everything is running through properly. It just
> > takes over an hour for the program to run now when it used to take
> > minutes. The application is using JDBC to communicate with a MS SQL
> > Server. It is basically synchronizing data for another process that runs
> on Windows.
> > --
> > This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L)
> > mailing list To post a message email: JAVA400-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] To
> > subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
> > or email: JAVA400-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Before posting, please take a
> > moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
> >
> >
> > --
> > This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L)
> > mailing list To post a message email: JAVA400-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] To
> > subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
> > or email: JAVA400-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Before posting, please take a
> > moment to review the archives at
> > https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
> >
> >
> --
> This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing
> list To post a message email: JAVA400-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] To subscribe,
> unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
> or email: JAVA400-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Before posting, please take a
> moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
>
>
> --
> This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: JAVA400-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
> or email: JAVA400-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.
>
>
-- 
This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.