RE: DataQueue performance jt400Native 10x slower then RPG
Richard Schoen <richard-DiTrGpQEJGItADg8e/3/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.as400.java |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CH2PR12MB416554A01123C9E675F2F388B7DF0@CH2PR12MB4165.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> |
Perhaps you could provide a working code sample of both programs that can be installed and run easily and we can perhaps test it and see exactly what you're doing specifically. Make each sample run the same transaction suite. Throw it in a zip file or github perhaps. Regards, Richard Schoen Web: http://www.richardschoen.net Email: richard-DiTrGpQEJGItADg8e/3/[email protected] ------------------------------ message: 5 date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:45:32 +0200 from: [email protected] subject: AW: Re: DataQueue performance jt400Native 10x slower then RPG when you look at the source of jt400Native.jar you can see that it also calls the native srvpgm in /QSYS.LIB/QYJSPART.SRVPGM so there is only a minimal java layer. there is no chance jdbc could get near this performance. i hoped someone with deeper knowlege of the performance impacts of calling rpg from java via jni could help. -- This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l or email: JAVA400-L-request-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l. Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com