RE: Java performance qshell javac

Richard Schoen <richard-DiTrGpQEJGItADg8e/3/[email protected]> Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:40:17 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.as400.java
Message-ID <CH0PR12MB52505DDFAC8E97AB2E0D4AF4B75A9@CH0PR12MB5250.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
64-bit instead of 32-bit JVM being called on one of the partitions ?

64-bit startup and speed always was slower.

Not sure if that's improved but someplace to look.

Regards,
Richard Schoen
Web: http://www.richardschoen.net
Email: richard-DiTrGpQEJGItADg8e/3/[email protected]
------------------------------

message: 5
date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:54:57 -0500
from: "John Allen" <[email protected]>
subject: RE: Java performance qshell javac

I inherited the encryption process (using the java program) as it was
written a while ago and is used in several places.

The performance issue was handed to me to speed up. I was hoping to find the
reason is so much slower on an almost identical partition
So that I don't have to open a whole big project for replacing the current
process.

But I may have to go this route if I don't find a solution.

Thanks for your thoughts Jack.

-- 
This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com