RE: Java performance qshell javac
"John Allen" <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Feb 2022 17:08:44 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.as400.java |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sorry about the slow response. Thanks for your thoughts John -----Original Message----- From: JAVA400-L [mailto:java400-l-bounces-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of D*B Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Java performance qshell javac John, I would think, that the CL variant wouldn't help, it will make up new qsh sessions and startup the JVM from scratch. I would recommend to run the java process on some linux or windows box to get an estimate, on as400 you should reach better performance, if you could use an already started jvm (and scalability would be nearly unlimited). Encrypting a file would be dependant on the size of the file and some seconds might be fast, or very slow. D*B -- This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l or email: JAVA400-L-request-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l. Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com -- This is the Java Programming on and around the IBM i (JAVA400-L) mailing list To post a message email: [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l or email: JAVA400-L-request-+hD5IHI5Xscn3HwCXmMcX9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/java400-l. Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com