Re: Mi vs C (was calling RPG ILE with parameter list from MI)
Jon Paris <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:03:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.as400.mi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11-Dec-07, at 1:00 PM, Mark S. Waterbury wrote: > There are a large number of OPM MI instructions that are not available > as ILE built-ins. As to performance, it depends on the algorithms used > and how they are coded. In many cases, OPM MI can perform very well. I didn't think there were many that mattered these days Mark but I bow to your superior knowledge on the subject. >> C code has to be a lot more maintainable than MI and there are many > more tools to work with it. > > It is certainly possible to write very obtuse code in C, almost as > cryptic and unreadable as some examples I have seen in APL. I think this misses the point - it is possible to write obscure code in any language - it is simply that some (APL being a good example of a write-only language) do a "better" job than others. The point I was trying to make was that there are a lot more tools out there to work with C code and by using C rather than MI you can use the (relatively) easy approach to file handling etc. provided by C rather than having to code it al the hard way in MI. You can also bind the resulting code into an RPG program for that matter. Jon Paris www.Partner400.com www.SystemiDeveloper.com _______________________________________________ This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list To post a message email: MI400-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400 or email: MI400-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.