Re: MI program unable to locate job - need assistance
Simon Coulter <shc-Q/[email protected]> Wed, 21 May 2008 13:15:14 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.as400.mi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 21/05/2008, at 11:48 AM, Paul Jackson wrote:
> All Lic and OS versions exactly the same.
This just gets more and more interesting. I'm not saying it is
impossible for Rochester to have done this but it does seem unlikely.
There must be something different that triggers this behaviour. PTF
level is one possibility but usually this sort of structural change
(I presume more than just the table size was moved) occurs on release
boundaries. The WCBT is more an OS function than a LIC function.
What differences exist between the systems that exhibit this
behaviour and those that don't? Some possibilities:
1) AS/400 vs iSeries vs System i?
2) Processor: Power 5 vs Power 5+ vs Power 6?
3) LPAR: Partitioned systems vs non-partitioned?
4) PTF levels?
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list
To post a message email: MI400-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400
or email: MI400-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.