Re: QPROCT and QPRODT
"Dennis Lovelady" <iseries-HF96MFG82JhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:06:21 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.as400.mi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002701cae876$b54fc7d0$1fef5770$@com> |
> You're probably missing nothing at all! I was just surprised that the > QPRCRTPG API doesn't flag /MXD, /HI, /NOR, /TR or /ZC as an invalid > branch/indicator keyword for the ADDN(IS) statement - that's all. I was > expecting a more rigorous syntax check from QPRCRTPG. > > Based on the documentation provided by IBM, the valid branch/indicator > tests > for ADDN are POS, NEG, ZER and UNOR - correct? Ah, I see where you're coming from now. I did not check the docs AFA what indics are available from ADDN, or might have followed. I am inclined to agree with you, but now I wonder: is the documentation faulty or is the fault with QPRCRTPG? Or maybe neither: does the doc say that those are the valid flags after ADDN, or does it say that those are the ones that may be affected? (See the subtle difference?) Dennis Lovelady http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady -- I bought some powdered water, but I don't know what to add to it. _______________________________________________ This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list To post a message email: MI400-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400 or email: MI400-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.