Security Level 50 differences between built-in wrapped and non-wrapped MI instructions?
Mike Amos <yl_mra-/[email protected]> Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:17:49 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.as400.mi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Reposted from midrange.midrange-l. In searching via the web and the IBM i Information Center, I cannot find out if the system limits access to built-in wrapped MI instructions the way it treats direct access to MI instructions at security level 50. Some System Interface functions are simply macros wrapping built-in wrapped MI instructions. At least one or two _Rxxx functions appear to be implemented the same way. These work fine at security level 50 and no exception are thrown. Is it safe to use all of the built-in wrapped instruction at security level 50? Will they be blocked without a special IBM macro wrapper? Although this is a general question, I am specifically interested in the MODINVAU built-in. Mike _______________________________________________ This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list To post a message email: MI400-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400 or email: MI400-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.