Re: Permissions of IFS file created with QZRUCLSP

On 3/16/2011 8:39 PM, CRPence wrote:
>
> If having "used the same concept in RPG and it worked great"
> sufficiently parallels the MI invocation, then probably not "an
> O_INHERITMODE flag issue". So if the RPG had performed the same unlink
> and open() as performed by the same user into the same directory yet did
> not exhibit the same "no permissions" outcome, then that flag is
> probably not germane; at least seems improbable unless the openFlag
> mismatched betwixt.
>

The open() API has optional parameters, prototyped in C by "..." and 
prototyped in RPG by OPTIONS(*NOPASS).  Parameters are passed 
differently when the compiler knows that some of them are optional.  For 
RPG, if you don't code OPTIONS(*NOPASS) on the optional parameters, the 
API might interpret the optional parameters incorrectly even when they 
are passed.

I'm just wondering if the other mechanisms to call open() are not able 
to pass the optional parameters correctly.
_______________________________________________
This is the MI Programming on the AS400 / iSeries (MI400) mailing list
To post a message email: MI400-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/mi400
or email: MI400-request-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/mi400.