Re: [C--] C-- development
Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Mar 2013 02:53:56 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.c-- |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:42:22 -0400, Norman Ramsey wrote: >> From my outsider perspective, it appears that C-- is moribund until > > someone picks it up again. However, I also think that, rather than > > starting from the current C-- code base, it would be better to > > migrate the distinctive features of C-- into the LLVM project. > > My opinion is that this would be nearly impossible. Well, with enough casts you can achieve almost anything. :-) But the I might as well be using C itself, and have the advantage of multiple compilers written to an exacting standard. > LLVM and C-- make > fundamentally different assumptions about what knowledge is preserved > during code generation. LLVM is a fantastic infrastructure but it > essentially aimed to do what gcc does, only better. C-- had very > different goals. I think it would be easier to do a new project from > scratch. It might be easier to compile LLVM to C--. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Cminusminus mailing list [email protected] https://lists.eecs.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/cminusminus