Call for Presentations: ACV Workshop at FLoC 2026
Ichiro Hasuo <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:30:10 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.mathematics.logic.acl2.general,gmane.comp.science.types.announce,gmane.science.mathematics.categories,gmane.science.mathematics.logic.coq.club,gmane.comp.lang.caml.inria,gmane.comp.mathematics.hol |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAbTGZUr0PPg5kGOxukCzhrdjSvZh_d4d5O4h8b5bN5pFTdYNg@mail.gmail.com> |
--00000000000007552e0650217d4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Apologies for multiple postings] ************************************************************************ Call for Presentations ACV 2026 --- First Workshop on Abstract and Concrete Techniques in Verification https://acv-ws.github.io/2026/ At FLoC 2026, affiliated with LICS 2026 and CAV 2026 Lisbon, Portugal, July 24-25, 2026 Submission deadline: May 6th 2026 AoE Organizers: Ichiro Hasuo, Bart Jacobs, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Sam Staton ************************************************************************ Highlights ------------- - A new workshop, aiming to promote the unification of abstract and concrete methods in formal verification - Great invited speakers (TBA :) Workshop Scope ------------------------ Formal verification research stands upon two lines of work. One is on abstract mathematical semantics of systems, defining systems=E2=80=99 behav= iors based on which formal verification is conducted. The other one is on concrete algorithms and methods that enable efficient and scalable verification. The two lines have some marked differences in their ecosystems. For example, experimental evaluation is virtually a must for the latter, while it is not for the former. Their different orientations=E2=80=94abstract and concrete=E2=80=94have made them hard to communicate with each other. However, a recent scientific trend points to the need, feasibility, and prolificacy of the unification of abstract and concrete. On the abstract side, more works have implementations and experiments, demonstrating right away the practical value of their abstract theory. Conversely, on the concrete side, abstraction, generalization, and unification of various concrete verification methods have been actively sought. This way, a new form of unification of abstract and concrete is emerging, centered around the mathematical languages of lattices and categories. This also follows a well-beaten track of the successful collaboration between abstract and concrete in programming language research (such as monads in functional programming). Such unification is much desired, too, now that the hard-to-(logically-)model nature of statistical AI is posing methodological challenges to formal verification. The goal of this workshop is to promote the unification of abstract and concrete and thus to incubate breakthroughs in formal verification. Specifically, - we gather a wide audience from the formal verification community, - we share results, observations, and experience from both sides of abstract and concrete, - we seek a common language, and - we seek matchings between abstract theories and concrete techniques, Thereby picturing a new form of formal verification research in the AI era. Call for Presentations ----------------------------- We solicit contributed presentations. Topics of interest include the following, although the list is by no means exclusive. - Abstract semantical techniques in formal verification, towards concrete methods - Lattice-theoretic modeling - Categorical modeling - Algebras and coalgebras - String diagrams - Implementation techniques for abstract theories - Concrete verification algorithms and methods, towards abstraction - Model checking - Theorem proving, automated and interactive - Program verification - Type systems - Probabilistic verification - Cyber-physical systems - Quantum systems - Accessible introduction to basics, abstract or concrete - Abstract semantical methods - Concrete verification methods - Examples of successful matchings between abstract and concrete, or efforts towards them Submission --------------- We call for presentation proposals describing ongoing research developments, an overview of past research, or a survey of a broad topic. A presentation of already published results, or those currently under review, is welcome, too. There are no formal proceedings. Submission deadline: May 6th 2026 AoE Submission link: https://submissions.floc26.org/acv/ Organizers ---------------- Ichiro Hasuo (National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan) Bart Jacobs (Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands) Joost-Pieter Katoen (RWTH Aachen University, Germany) Sam Staton (University of Oxford, UK) --00000000000007552e0650217d4d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">[Apologies for multiple postings]<br>*********************= ***************************************************<br>Call for Presentatio= ns<br><br>ACV 2026<br>--- First Workshop on Abstract and Concrete Technique= s in Verification<br><br><a href=3D"https://acv-ws.github.io/2026/">https:/= /acv-ws.github.io/2026/</a><br><br>At FLoC 2026, affiliated with LICS 2026 = and CAV 2026<br>Lisbon, Portugal, July 24-25, 2026<br><br>Submission deadli= ne: May 6th 2026 AoE<div>Organizers: Ichiro Hasuo, Bart Jacobs, Joost-Piete= r Katoen, Sam Staton<br>***************************************************= *********************<br><br>Highlights<br>-------------<br>- A new worksho= p, aiming to promote the unification of abstract and concrete methods in fo= rmal verification<br>- Great invited speakers (TBA :)<br><br>Workshop Scope= <br>------------------------<br>Formal verification research stands upon tw= o lines of work. One is on abstract mathematical semantics of systems, defi= ning systems=E2=80=99 behaviors based on which formal verification is condu= cted. The other one is on concrete algorithms and methods that enable effic= ient and scalable verification.<br><br>The two lines have some marked diffe= rences in their ecosystems. For example, experimental evaluation is virtual= ly a must for the latter, while it is not for the former. Their different o= rientations=E2=80=94abstract and concrete=E2=80=94have made them hard to co= mmunicate with each other.<br><br>However, a recent scientific trend points= to the need, feasibility, and prolificacy of the unification of abstract a= nd concrete. On the abstract side, more works have implementations and expe= riments, demonstrating right away the practical value of their abstract the= ory. Conversely, on the concrete side, abstraction, generalization, and uni= fication of various concrete verification methods have been actively sought= .<br><br>This way, a new form of unification of abstract and concrete is em= erging, centered around the mathematical languages of lattices and categori= es. This also follows a well-beaten track of the successful collaboration b= etween abstract and concrete in programming language research (such as mona= ds in functional programming). Such unification is much desired, too, now t= hat the hard-to-(logically-)model nature of statistical AI is posing method= ological challenges to formal verification.<br><br>The goal of this worksho= p is to promote the unification of abstract and concrete and thus to incuba= te breakthroughs in formal verification. Specifically,<br><br>- we gather a= wide audience from the formal verification community,<br>- we share result= s, observations, and experience from both sides of abstract and concrete,<b= r>- we seek a common language, and<br>- we seek matchings between abstract = theories and concrete techniques,<br><br>Thereby picturing a new form of fo= rmal verification research in the AI era.<br><br><br>Call for Presentations= <br>-----------------------------<br>We solicit contributed presentations. = Topics of interest include the following, although the list is by no means = exclusive.<br><br>- Abstract semantical techniques in formal verification, = towards concrete methods<br>=C2=A0 - Lattice-theoretic modeling<br>=C2=A0 -= Categorical modeling<br>=C2=A0 - Algebras and coalgebras<br>=C2=A0 - Strin= g diagrams<br>=C2=A0 - Implementation techniques for abstract theories<br>-= Concrete verification algorithms and methods, towards abstraction<br>=C2= =A0 - Model checking<br>=C2=A0 - Theorem proving, automated and interactive= <br>=C2=A0 - Program verification<br>=C2=A0 - Type systems<br>=C2=A0 - Prob= abilistic verification<br>=C2=A0 - Cyber-physical systems<br>=C2=A0 - Quant= um systems<br>- Accessible introduction to basics, abstract or concrete<br>= =C2=A0 - Abstract semantical methods<br>=C2=A0 - Concrete verification meth= ods<br>- Examples of successful matchings between abstract and concrete, or= efforts towards them<br><br>Submission<br>---------------<br>We call for p= resentation proposals describing ongoing research developments, an overview= of past research, or a survey of a broad topic. A presentation of already = published results, or those currently under review, is welcome, too. There = are no formal proceedings.<br><br>Submission deadline: May 6th 2026 AoE<br>= Submission link: <a href=3D"https://submissions.floc26.org/acv/">https://su= bmissions.floc26.org/acv/</a><br><br>Organizers<br>----------------<br>Ichi= ro Hasuo (National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan)<br>Bart Jacobs (= Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands)<br>Joost-Pieter Katoen (RWTH= Aachen University, Germany)<br>Sam Staton (University of Oxford, UK)<br></= div></div> --00000000000007552e0650217d4d--