Re: [stack] Stack Shuffling Operator Mnemonics

> > ab-aba
> > abc-abac
> > abc-cba
> > abc-cbac
> >
> > ...and the nice thing is, you don't have to think of all the combos
> > the users will ever need; they learn how to write one, and the rest
> > just fall out naturally. And if they users want to use xyz instead of
> > abc, no problem.
>
> and since something like -abac is syntactically illegal,
> you can just extend the syntax to have it mean abc-abac.
>
> waste not, want not.

The next logical step then seems to be to simply drop the "-", and use
the library defined "abac" function that I proposed. Now you don't
have to change the syntax of the language at all, which seems to be a
huge plus.

Christopher Diggins