Re: Re: [stack] Re: Flat concatenative basis (was: Concatenative macros?)
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
stevan apter <[email protected]> wrote: > as usual, work that you consider throw-away contains more insights than can fit in a standard > published article, much less the margins of one. I'm looking forward to your genetic system -- one would expect that it would be useful for the same purpose. Perhaps you should tailor a version of it to accept the same input as Kerby's, so we cant directly compare them. Also, Enchilada's tree data structure might be extremely useful for this. > - Brent -Billy