Re: [stack] S-K Construction of Dip?

Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.concatenative
Message-ID <C2171500.7E3%[email protected]>


On 22/2/07 5:55 PM, "Brent L Kerby" <[email protected]> wrote:

>  
>  
> 
> [..]
> - Brent
> 
> P.S., Manfred, 
> 
> Christopher and I are using "b" to refer to the following combinator:
> 
> [Z] [Y] [X] b == [[Z] Y] X
> 
> which is the concatenative version of the classical "B" combinator (as "s",
> "c", "w", "k", and "i" are the concatenative versions of the classical S, C,
> W, K, and I combinators), while your "b" is
> 
> [Y] [X] b == Y X
> 
> I didn't notice you had already defined "b", so sorry about that; I wasn't
> intending to create a conflict in the notation.
>    
Thanks for the clarification, my mistake really.
  - Manfred


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.