[stack] Small remarks (corrections?) while look through the "Mathematical foundations of Joy"

Michael Nedzelsky <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.concatenative
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi All,

I have read (not in full details, though) the text "Mathematical foundations 
of Joy" (See: http://www.latrobe.edu.au/philosophy/phimvt/joy/j02maf.html )

Here some small remarks.

1) At the beginning of the secion "Function composition and the identity 
function" .

<quote>
If the programs P and Q denote the same function, then the functions P and Q 
are identical. Two functions are identical if for all values in the 
intersection of their domains they yield the same value.
...
The identity relation between functions is clearly reflexive, symmetric and 
transitive.
</quote>

It seems that the second sentence must be:
Two functions are identical if and only if their domains are coincided and for 
all values in their domains these functions yield the same value.
Otherwise, if we take the second sentence as the definition of "identical", 
than this relation will not be transitive.

2) At the end of the secion "Function composition and the identity function" .
<quote>
It is appropriate to remark here that there is also a left zero element and 
there is a right zero element.
Two such elements l and r satisfy the following for all programs P: 
        l  P   ==   l                   P  r   ==   r
Since function composition is not commutative, the two zero elements are not
identical. In Joy the left zero l is the abort operator, it ignores any 
program following it.
The right zero r is the clearstack operator, it empties the stack and hence 
ignores any calculations that might have been done before.
</quote>

I think in our case there is no such thing as right zero.
Assume that  program P will be run forever for some initial state, than 
clearly for that P we have
  P r =/= r  (clearstack operator on the left side will never get a chance to 
execute)

Regards,
  Michael Nedzelsky
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.