Re: [stack] Is this language concatenative?
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Nedzelsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > Consider the following example. Is this language concatenative? Hmm. It seems that it could be. It's not very different from a flat concatenative language. It kind of looks like you've placed the lexer inside the parser (there's nothing wrong with that). Your language would look more like a typical flat concatenative language (but would still fail this definition) if it accepted any letter of the alphabet inside the parens. Another obvious example of a language disqualified under the strict reading of this definition would be a normal concatenative language with literals, or with shuffle notation. We seem to be getting closer, though. > Michael Nedzelsky -Billy