Re: [stack] Is this language concatenative?
Michael Nedzelsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2 May 2007 12:34 am, William Tanksley, Jr wrote:
> Should our definition allow for languages which are
> perhaps not _entirely_ concatenative, but whose "top layer" is
> concatenative?
It seems to me (I can be wrong here), that already Joy is not _entirely_
concatenative because of quotation. I think the quotation as basic operation
has the same status as concatenation.
Michael Nedzelsky
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/