Re: [stack] Is this language concatenative?

John Cowan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.concatenative
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Nedzelsky scripsit:

> I think you mean the following:
>        "a" intern "b" intern "c" intern [] cons cons cons

Yes, of course.  That comes of posting code late at night....

> But if any literal list can be constructed using only string literals,
> intern, [] and cons, then the subset of Floy in which the only quotation
> is empty list is already sufficient. Am I missing anything here?

Only a historical fact: that it was I who added intern to Joy's
primitive words when modifying the Joy interpreter to add
general gc, floating-point support, and files, and therefore
Manfred's papers don't reflect it.

-- 
John Cowan   http://ccil.org/~cowan    [email protected]
We want more school houses and less jails; more books and less arsenals;
more learning and less vice; more constant work and less crime; more
leisure and less greed; more justice and less revenge; in fact, more of
the opportunities to cultivate our better natures.  --Samuel Gompers
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.