Re: [stack] a concatenative language for the Semantic Web

On 5/20/07, Joshua Shinavier wrote:
>
>
> [...]  I hope this was interesting.  Comments and
> criticism are very welcome.
>
>
I'm interested.  A couple questions:

I don't understand how the concatenative aspect works to your advantage.
Can you elaborate?

As a veteran of Lisp and Scheme, I think I would naturally turn to them when
presented with this kind of problem.  If you have reasons why Ripple is more
suitable than Lisp or Scheme, it might help me better understand what you're
doing.

--Joe


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]