Re: [stack] a concatenative language for the Semantic Web
"Joe Bowbeer" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/22/07, William Tanksley, Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Good point about the stack. Do your code fragments stand alone, or do > they > > communicate via the stack(s)? (If they stand alone, then an enclosing > "let" > > expression could be used in Lisp to define temporary variables.) > > "let" defines bound variables; he's working point-free, which means he > doesn't use them. > > Thanks. I get that. It's as clear to me as if someone wrote "A hammer drives nails, but he's using a screw driver, so he doesn't need nails." My question "Do the code fragments stand alone?" is more at "Why use a screwdriver?" --Joe [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]