Re: [stack] Monads in a Stack-Based Language
"Christopher Diggins" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes there is no real reason not to use "dip" throughout. I just thought that just would makes more explicit what the term rewriting strategy should be. On 7/11/07, Chris Double <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ... [1] dip [2] dip [+] dip .x swap [*] dip ... > > Why rewrite using so many invocations of dip? Couldn't you rewrite to: > > ... [ 1 2 + ] dip .x swap * ... > > Chris. > -- > http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]