Re: [stack] A bit more about Catenate

Don Groves <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.concatenative
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Billy,

Yes, I've read Baker's papers and they obviously affected my thinking
about languages.

Thanks for the tip on the other topic.
--
Don



On Aug 16, 2007, at 19:57 , William Tanksley, Jr wrote:

> Don Groves <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I haven't considered the idea of two functions wanting to index  
>> the same
>> array but that doesn't sound like something I'd need to do anyway, at
>> least it's never come up for me before ;-)
>
> If the functions need to do that sequentially, there's no problem --
> you pass the reference to the first function, then the second
> function. If they need to operate in parallel you have to make a copy.
>
>> There still may be serious problems I haven't foreseen with my  
>> approach,
>> I'm no expert in all this and there's a lot of learning as I go
>> along. Kinda what makes it so much fun!
>
> Obviously you've read your Henry Baker,
> http://home.pipeline.com/~hbaker1/ForthStack.html (I cite this for the
> benefit of others interested). He explains how linear logic works and
> why it insists on only one reference per object.
>
>> Don Groves
>
> -Billy
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.