Re: [stack] Functional Forth?

On Sep 19, 2007, at 19:41 , William Tanksley, Jr wrote:

> http://wiki.forthfreak.net/index.cgi?FunForth
>
> Functional Forth. Written in a few lines of Forth. Speaks for itself.
> I didn't know that was possible.

Forth is one of the most malleable languages in existence due to  
everything
being exposed and modifiable. I remember a comp.lang.forth response from
Elizabeth Rather of Forth, Inc. to someone who disliked Forth's  
postfix syntax:
"Why don't you just change it then?"
--
Don Groves

"Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy."  
-- Joseph Campbell