Re: [stack] Parameters: ordered versus named
Manfred Von Thun <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C32815CD.BF5%[email protected]> |
Thanks Robbert. Very interesting indeed. There is another feature which I have not seen before (and which has nothing to do with ordered/named parameters): one and the same procedure can use Cartesian or polar coordinates, and their interrelation is expressed in the list of (named) parameters. Very clever. - Manfred On 7/9/07 7:03 PM, "Robbert van Dalen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Manfred, > > Interesting post as usual. > > You may want to check: http://blog.moertel.com/articles/2006/01/20/ > wondrous-oddities-rs-function-call-semantics > Function definitions in the R language follow your classification #3: > bodies and calls rely on names. > > - Robbert > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]