Re: [stack] Re: Concatenative operators as functions over stacks.
Don Groves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 15, 2007, at 19:13 , pml060912 wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Don Groves" <dgroves@...> > wrote: >> >> I've long been intrigued by Manfred's statement that Joy operators >> are >> best described as functions from stacks to stacks > > . > . >> By adding additional notation for lists, sets, ..., this method seems >> able to account for any concatentative operation. > > That's another way of expanding what you can do with one stack, enough > to make it Turing equivalent. And of course I provide that in Furphy > too - but it turns out, so far, that this is orthogonal to what Furphy > does with higher order, two stack using, operations. PML. Thanks for the response, Peter.