Re: [stack] language hierarchy
Don Groves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 11, 2007, at 19:16 , William Tanksley, Jr wrote: > Don Groves <[email protected]> wrote: >> William Tanksley, Jr wrote: >> I was considering playing with it in ACL, so maybe I should >> reconsider. > > Please don't let me stop you :-). I've got nothing but curiosity time > left right now. > >> If you do try it, please keep us posted on your results. > > Nope, not gonna do it... I've got too much else to do. Me too -- it's a common problem these days. It's on my to-do list. -- Don >>> Is that true? Are the *rec functions especially good with >>> concatenative languages? (I don't know.) I'm sure they work with any >>> functional language... > >> Well, they seem to be especially good in Joy, the prototypical >> concatenative >> language. As to whether or not something else might work better, at >> this point I'm not qualified to say. > > Yup, me neither. > >> Don > > -Wm > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >