Re: [stack] disallowing recursive definitions
John Nowak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 28, 2008, at 3:39 PM, John Nowak wrote: > 6. It becomes possible to prove termination when using recursive > combinators that always terminate given that their arguments always > terminate (such as primrec). To clarify, this is possible with recursive definitions as well. Without them however, it's a trivial addition to the type system that works exactly the same way that tracking of side effects works. - John