Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax

On Mar 7, 2008, at 2:15 PM, John Nowak wrote:

> They did not have any errors, although it seems to me that the errors
> in our pointfree code were due to translating the lambda-based
> versions and getting it wrong. In particular, the lambda version
> didn't need to pop the function because binding it to 'f' removed it
> from the stack. When doing the translation, we both forgot to pop it
> explicitly.

Actually, let me clarify. *I* forgot to pop it explicitly. You didn't  
pop it because apparently not clearly explaining how variables work.  
I'll try to get this written up in a more formal manner.

- John