Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax

John Nowak <[email protected]> wrote:
>  William Tanksley, Jr wrote:
>  This is a very important point, and it's the primary reason that I'm
>  pursuing a typed concatenative language. I'm doing all of the
>  prototyping in Scheme, so it isn't as if I'm insistent that typed
>  languages are the old way to go. Even if you prefer untyped languages,
>  I think further research in this direction will be helpful to
>  concatenative languages as a whole.

I very much look forward to the results of your research.

>  Oh I can't write anything that sounds nice in the morning...

Hmm, you made sense to me. And I also appreciate your ability to
respond to criticism politely, even when it makes little sense.

>  - John

-Wm