Re: [stack] sweetening concatenative syntax

John Nowak <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.concatenative
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mar 7, 2008, at 3:13 PM, William Tanksley, Jr wrote:

>>> Perhaps you find it easier, but there's objective reason why it
>>> shouldn't be easier. The point-free version is linear
>
>> They're both linear, at least where "linear" refers to how objects  
>> are
>> referenced.
>
> 'f' is referred to twice; that's nonlinear.

Keep in mind that the pointful version gets translated to pointfree  
code. It's just syntactic sugar. After the translation, each value is  
referenced only once. The function will need to be copied once (as it  
does when writing the pointfree version by hand), but no actual  
copying needs to occur if the function was not created via composing  
or partial application; it's just a pointer assignment. That's just an  
implementation detail though.

Perhaps it'll be easier to show that it's linear once I can actually  
do the conversion... *ahem*

- John
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.