Re: [stack] Notation for typed arrays in Cat

> John Nowak <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  Here's another attempt at a concatenative type notation. We assume
>
> Technically, strongForth's type notation is stack based. (The
> exceptions are his compound types, and even those could be made so.)
>
> I'm not sure what it buys you, though -- types don't have the same
> factorization properties as words, do they?

Indeed; I don't think it buys you much. It's very likely a terrible idea.

- John