Re: [stack] Re: Evolutionary Programming
"William Tanksley, Jr" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stevan Apter <[email protected]> wrote: > or search back in the concatenative archives and read billy > tanksley's remarks about his languages 01 and 10 and their > suitability for darwinian evolutionary experiments. The nice thing about 01 (or 10, it's just a logical NOT away) is that you can cut and splice anything anywhere and it's still a valid program. The bad thing is that I still haven't decided how to express input/output... It's merely a matter of convention, but it's a pretty important convention. I've not touched "tworing", my 10 lab program, in a while; one of its unit tests fail, and I'm not sure why. I want to use it to design a more effective base ... I've got some theories about what might make a base better than another one, I just need to do some testing. BTW, while you're thinking about evolutionary algorithms, check this page out: http://williamtozier.com/slurry/2008/04/02/search-algorithms. -Wm