Re: [stack] Evolutionary Programming

I know little of joy and none of floy.
> OOPS likes to extend its programs a single >instruction at a time, which is easier for the >linear style.

Please define 'linear style'.
From your description, machine-code is linear,
because all 'constructs' are acheived by goto/s.

I suspected the 'extend by 1 instr scheme', but
couldn't find concrete reference -- yet.

Re. OOPS' probability-matrix: does each instruction
aquire a probability ?
And does it's initial probability also change/evolve?

== Chris Glur.