Re: [stack] Advantages of cat, joy ..?
John Nowak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 16, 2009, at 2:50 PM, William Tanksley wrote: > John Nowak wrote: >> 2. Stack-based concatenative languages are well-suited to a linear >> implementation; see Henry Baker's "The Forth Shall Be First" paper. I >> may, however, be the only one interested in this. > > You are not the only one; I've been interested in that since I read > it, > way back in the mists of memory. I may not be totally crazy then. >> 3. First-order stack-based languages are well-suited to a graphical >> representation once you apply a type discipline. This would mesh very >> well with a linear implementation. > > I agree, although "type discipline" isn't as strictly important as > static stack effects. You're right; factor's stack inference would be enough provided you're willing to shrug when a definition can't infer. Nowadays though, it seems most things infer fine. > It would be very interesting, also, to consider a few different ideas: Interesting ideas! - John