Re: [stack] function/object ambiguity + quotation alternative

Christopher Diggins <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.concatenative
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
>> the evaluator would not abide naked functions on the stack; it would apply repeatedly until that was not the case.

Then you have a first order language. I don't really see what that
buys you. Why not allow functions on the stack? It seems to me that
higher-order languages are only a positive thing. Joy and its ilk are
only interesting to me because they allow functions on the stack.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.