Re: [stack] function/object ambiguity + quotation alternative

On Feb 26, 2009, at 3:08 PM, John Nowak wrote:

> Accordingly, the result of evaluation '5 [dup]' is a stack with two  
> elements; the first is the value 5 and the  second is the value 'dup'.

Sorry, that should read as follows:

"Accordingly, the result of evaluation '5 [dup] first' is a stack with  
two elements; the first is the value 5 and the second is the value dup."

- John