Re: [stack] things
spir <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20090304141607.6e3f8be1@o> |
Le Wed, 4 Mar 2009 05:32:58 -0500, John Nowak <[email protected]> s'exprima ainsi: > > -5- one unique "operational" primitive word: "write" > Aka Factor and Joy's '.' word. ??? > > -5- code is thing > > Code is data of the type thing, too. > Joy is the king here. ??? [...] > To be honest, it looks like a waste of time. I'd encourage you to look > closer at Joy and use Factor before you start thinking of things to > change. I don't mean do discourage experimentation of course, but you > asked for criticism, and what you're proposing looks like a (slow) > dead end. Sorry, I was not clear enough: I do not mean making anything useful. Just to construct some toy language myself, and play with its design, in order to better understand what all of you are talking about. [From this point of view, comparing with existing languages that have this or that feature makes no sense by itself. I'm not competing...] Denis ------ la vita e estrany