Re: [stack] Re: unary functions from X to Y?
Chris Double <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.concatenative |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:02 PM, John Nowak <[email protected]> wrote: > I was not aware of 'abort'; you are certainly right it seems. As I > know very little about XY, I'll have to take your word for it > regarding '=>'. '=>' is a it like >r in factor except it doesn't use a separate retain stack. It takes 1 item off the stack and places it at the tail of the queue. If it's not popped off later with '<=' it gets executed when the queue reaches that point. > I suppose I should actually use XY one of these days... at least > before I make any more claims about it. Until then, please consider my > proposal void. I have mostly working JS implementation: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/concatenative/message/4305 It doesn't do the projection thing mentioned above however. Chris. -- http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz