Re: [stack] Evolutionary Programming & presentation-format.

On Jan 10, 2010, at 8:03 PM, chris glur wrote:

> I guess where 'joy' comes in, is that the code must remain  
> syntactically
> valid after it's been modified, and joy satisfies this easily - or  
> does it?
> Considering lisp, which consists to nested symbolic-expressions: if  
> you
> replaced any one s-exprn with another, I guess it would remain
> syntactically valid?

No due to macros, lexical scoping, etc.

- jn