Re: [stack] An Overlooked Paradigm in Functional Programming

> The absurdity of MANUALLY translating the 1-line pseudocode
> to joy, when a simple/immediate algol-like compilation is
> available tells much?
]That's not even a remotely fair translation as it's not recursive like
]the example. The straight-forward recursive function is as such:

I MIGHT analyse your code in the future, but:
I merely PASTED the joy-author's ample 1-line pseudocode and HIS
 joy version.

I won't follow your NEW argument about Haskell etc. on the going
nowhere [because it's fun] journey. Can't someone answer MY question/s?
I've got a specific goal and am NOT just playing 'look ma no hands' !


On 1/31/10, William Tanksley, Jr <[email protected]> wrote:
> John Nowak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> of 'pred'. The latter is an advantage, although it's one that goes
>> away when the stack-based version is written out visually (which is
>> something I'll be harassing you all with soon enough).
>>
>
> Ah! This sounds promising.
>
> - jn
>
>
> -Wm
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>