> Ok I get the point.
> But do you like the idea of it? I certainly don't ;-)
Nope. This is why FPC has a {$packrecords C} to turn on such alignment,
since it is quite common.
I'm not to deep into BCB<->Delphi interoperability, but I assume one can fix
that there too. I just don't know about it, and the manual way always work.
> In my view, this is one reason not to combine Delphi and C code for exchanging data between DLL's
>
> I changed from Delphi to C#(.net), and I don't regret it.
I think it is much to early to seriously consider .NET, regardless of language
Anyway, I work multiplatform, so then .NET is not a serious option (yet).
Specially with the delay of Longhorn/Avalon, I postpone .NET even further. I
_don't want to rewrite my apps again_ then.
> Especially in calling C++ dll's.
One can call C++ dlls from Delphi afaik, just not MSVC dlls. Keep languages and implementations apart.
- So Microsoft compilers work with other Microsoft compilers
- Borland with Borland,
- Free Pascal with GNU.
etc
(Kylix also works with GNU afaik, don't know if that trickled into D6/D7)
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/i7folB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Delphi-JEDI/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.