[dylan-lang/opendylan] 8c01a8: [dfmc-c-back-end] UWP needs volatile locals.

  Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.com/dylan-lang/opendylan
  Commit: 8c01a876118b66ee424d3799a513a48d774dbcbc
      https://github.com/dylan-lang/opendylan/commit/8c01a876118b66ee424d3799a513a48d774dbcbc
  Author: Bruce Mitchener <[email protected]>
  Date:   2015-06-17 (Wed, 17 Jun 2015)

  Changed paths:
    M sources/dfmc/c-back-end/c-back-end.dylan
    M sources/dfmc/c-back-end/c-emit-c-object.dylan
    M sources/dfmc/c-back-end/c-emit-object.dylan

  Log Message:
  -----------
  [dfmc-c-back-end] UWP needs volatile locals.

Previously, we only made locals volatile when the function
body contained a block with a non-local entry state. They
actually should be volatile if there is any <unwind-protect>
involved as well.

* sources/dfmc/c-back-end/c-emit-object.dylan
  (emit-lambda-body-using-function): Factor out code and call
    need-volatile-locals?.

* sources/dfmc/c-back-end/c-emit-c-object.dylan
  (emit-lambda-body-using-function): Factor out code and call
    need-volatile-locals?.

* sources/dfmc/c-back-end/c-back-end.dylan
  (need-volatile-locals?): New function factored out from the
    above, but also checks for <unwind-protect>.


  Commit: afd759569b7440c69dfa8761eff32872dd543aad
      https://github.com/dylan-lang/opendylan/commit/afd759569b7440c69dfa8761eff32872dd543aad
  Author: Peter S. Housel <[email protected]>
  Date:   2015-06-17 (Wed, 17 Jun 2015)

  Changed paths:
    M sources/dfmc/c-back-end/c-back-end.dylan
    M sources/dfmc/c-back-end/c-emit-c-object.dylan
    M sources/dfmc/c-back-end/c-emit-object.dylan

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Merge pull request #926 from waywardmonkeys/volatile-with-unwind-protect

[dfmc-c-back-end] UWP needs volatile locals.


Compare: https://github.com/dylan-lang/opendylan/compare/163b7db9faf0...afd759569b74

_______________________________________________
chatter mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendylan.org/mailman/listinfo/chatter