Re: Overcoming the "Dylan is Dead" belief?
Guyren G Howe <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:51:55 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.dylan.gwydion.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I would say the best bang for your buck would be in a moral equivalent of Rails. I know, easy to say, but Ruby was fairly obscure before Rails came along. Anything that tries to be a UI tool needs to do at least one handheld platform. Desktop is almost secondary these days, but if you did Android, Mac, Windows and iOS you would be in with a shot. I'm betting we aren't close to being able to do handheld, in which case your best bet is with server-side, which is to say web development. If you had something really compelling there — say you gave me a single framework that wrapped up the likes of Apache with the application code, you might be in with a shot. Perhaps if you got a desktop UI for the server really easily at the same time. But I think the current Dylan is stuck with too small a feature footprint to really compete in any of these spaces. A really cool web serving platform would be the best bet, but it's not a great one. Now, if Dylan could compile for JVM or using LLVM, so I could use another platform's libraries, that might be a different story… I've lurked for years. I love the design of the language and I only wish I could use it for real work. But I'm not seeing a short path from here to there, sorry to say. On Sep 10, 2013, at 6:35 , Bruce Mitchener <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > > Repeatedly, I have run into people who thought Dylan was long gone and dead. People often think it was an Apple-only project and that when Apple killed Apple Dylan, it was the fatal blow and that there wasn't anything available. > > This has been a common refrain in conversations, when we do a release ("Wow, I didn't know Dylan was still around."), and when others bring it up. > > It has been suggested a number of times that we should consider renaming things to divorce ourselves from the past and allow people to get to know us under a new identity. That'd be a lot of work though and would have issues with things like the DRM and DPG which we can't go and rename. I also think that having the history is valuable at times in and of itself. Dylan had grand origins and it needn't shy away from them, perhaps. > > What can we do? What should we do? > > - Bruce > > _______________________________________________ > hackers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendylan.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers _______________________________________________ hackers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendylan.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers