Re: [dylan] Stream locking (was: Method combinations as a design pattern for locking)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA384

On 12/18/2013 13:24, Hannes Mehnert wrote:
> I also do not understand why you want to remove (in your branch)
> both the init-value for the private-stream-lock-value slot of 
> <basic-stream>, as well as the calls to with-stream-locked from
> within io? Does the test whether stream-lock is non-false (in
> lock-stream) lower the performance in a significant way?

I actually understand a bit better now... The lock-stream is an open
generic, thus with-stream-locked turns into two GF dispatches all the
time (one for lock, the other for unlock-stream).


Hannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
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=i4wj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
hackers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendylan.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers