Re: Generators for the other Joe-E array types

Hi Adrian,

When you code this up, you might want to use the term "Builder"
instead of "Generator" so as to follow the convention set by
java.lang.StringBuilder.

--Tyler

On Dec 19, 2007 3:01 PM, Adrian Mettler <[email protected]> wrote:
> This all looks good so far; I'll put out a version of the library that
> includes this after Christmas, along with the runtime taming stuff.  The
> new version of the verifier that includes this is making progress and
> should be released in early January (it won't quite be ready before the
> holidays).
> -Adrian
>
>
> David Wagner wrote:
> > Tyler Close writes:
> >> I think we need generators, like the recently discussed
> >> ByteArray.Generator class, for all the other Joe-E array types as
> >> well.
> >
> > This sounds good to me.  Adrian, what do you think?  Are you okay
> > with this?
> >
> >> I think we need something like:
> >>
> >>    interface Generator<T> {
> >>        void append(T value);
> >>        ConstArray<T> snapshot();
> >>    }
> >
> > You mentioned that you wanted to eliminate all unsafe casts.  The
> > interface above may require casting the return value of snapshot()
> > to the appropriate subtype of ConstArray.  For example, consider the
> > following usage:
> >     Generator<T> g = PowerlessArray.generate(n);
> >     ...
> >     PowerlessArray<T> a = (PowerlessArray<T>) g.snapshot();
> > The last line requires an unchecked cast.  Is that okay?  Would you
> > prefer to have the interface be designed to be statically type-safe?
> >
> > For example, would the following alternative be better?
> >     interface Generator<A extends ConstArray<T>,T> {
> >         void append(T value);
> >         A snapshot();
> >     }
> > Each Joe-E array type would provide a generate() method that returns
> > the appropriate type; e.g., PowerlessArray<T>.generate()'s return type
> > would be Generator<PowerlessArray<T>,T>.  That would eliminate the
> > need to cast the return value of Generator.snapshot() to the appropriate
> > array type.  Does this seem like an improvement?
> > _______________________________________________
> > e-lang mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/e-lang
>
> _______________________________________________
> e-lang mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/e-lang
>



-- 
Use web-keys for RESTful access-control:
http://waterken.sourceforge.net/

Name your trusted sites to distinguish them from phishing sites.
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/957/