Re: Fwd: When will we see a solid capability OS?

David Hopwood <david.hopwood-mRVxzIiVagSlV3Ge8JjJtnfLna9zW77MtUK59QYPAWc@public.gmane.org>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.e.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Constantine Plotnikov wrote:
> IMHO the most acute problem is a good application-level persistence
> model (unless I have missed some breakthrough here). Note I do not
> think that orthogonal persistence model is sustainable in the long run
> (more on that is here:
> http://constantine-plotnikov.blogspot.com/2007/02/software-system-longevity-paradigms.html).

Support for persistent capabilities does not imply support for orthogonal
persistence.

Persistent capabilities can be implemented in a filesystem-oriented
model, just by splitting each file into data and capability "forks"
(the latter acting as an array of capabilities), and adding primitives
to get or set the capabilities in a particular subrange of a designated
file's capability fork.

-- 
David Hopwood
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.