Re: Fwd: When will we see a solid capability OS?
David Hopwood <david.hopwood-mRVxzIiVagSlV3Ge8JjJtnfLna9zW77MtUK59QYPAWc@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Constantine Plotnikov wrote: > IMHO the most acute problem is a good application-level persistence > model (unless I have missed some breakthrough here). Note I do not > think that orthogonal persistence model is sustainable in the long run > (more on that is here: > http://constantine-plotnikov.blogspot.com/2007/02/software-system-longevity-paradigms.html). Support for persistent capabilities does not imply support for orthogonal persistence. Persistent capabilities can be implemented in a filesystem-oriented model, just by splitting each file into data and capability "forks" (the latter acting as an array of capabilities), and adding primitives to get or set the capabilities in a particular subrange of a designated file's capability fork. -- David Hopwood