Re: An attack on a mint
"Raoul Duke" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > things you want it to do) but not so good when you want to ensure > > that undesired behavior is absent (that the code doesn't do bad > > things you don't want it ever to do). Ja, everything is probabilistic when you get right down to it. It is a question of to what degree, and how do you want to get a handle on the range of possibilities. Testing (in various forms) can be a great tool to those ends. Specifications would be good. Specifications with testing would be good. Automated tests generated from specs would be good. Etc. (the QuickCheck paper(s) for Erlang are a great read.) sincerely.